NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY;
Volume: 22 (No.1) - pp. 44 - 52 - Art no:e261501
Preliminary comparative overview of the diet of brown frogs' tadpoles (Rana temporaria, Rana dalmatina, Rana graeca) (Anura: Ranidae) from several localities in the Republic of Serbia
Full-length research papers → Herpetology
Authors
Glorija ĆIRKOVIĆ1, Aleksandra RAKONJAC1, 2, Rastko AJTIĆ1,*
1. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Department for Biology and Ecology, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Republic of Serbia
2. Institute for Vegetable Crops Smederevska Palanka, Karađorđeva 71, Smederevska Palanka, Republic of Serbia
* Corresponding author: R. Ajtić, E-mail: rastko.ajtic@pmf.kg.ac.rs
DOI https://doi.org/10.61215/nwjz.2026.22.1.06
Download PDF
Keywords
anuran larvae, feeding types, food chains, pollution.
Abstract
The decline in consumer diversity in freshwater ecosystems is accelerating. Being both prey and predator in these ecosystems and dependent on aquatic habitats due to their complex life histories, amphibians are more vulnerable to pollution and global warming than other vertebrates. The life cycle of anuran amphibians includes a specific larval stage tadpole. During metamorphosis, tadpoles undergo dramatic changes in morphology, behavior, and diet, primarily accompanied by a transition from an aquatic to a terrestrial habitat. Consequently, anurans are important members of food webs and a link between these two habitats. Despite that, there is insufficient data on their nutrition, and understanding the nutritional requirements of a specific species or its developmental stage is essential for population survival. The primary aim of our study was to gather data on the nutritional types, feeding behaviors, and diets of tadpoles from several localities in the Republic of Serbia. Rana temporaria, R. dalmatina, and R. graeca are widely distributed in Serbia, occupying various habitats. We collected 572 tadpoles of these three species across 10 different localities and analyzed their intestinal contents. The results indicated quite diverse diets within and among species. The dominant food items were algae (especially diatoms), followed by detritus and pollen; some inorganic particles, such as microplastics, were also found. Animal prey was rarely found but was present in the intestinal content of some samples. These results significantly enhance understanding of tadpole nutrition and represent the first findings in our country with such a large sample size. Additionally, they provide an important foundation for future research.
Article history
Received: 24 February 2025 / Accepted: 30 December 2025 / Published online: 15 June 2026 / Printed: 30 June 2026
Authors` ORCID IDs
References
1. Alford, R.A. (1999): Ecology: resource use, competition, and predation. pp: 240-279. In: McDiarmid, R.W., Altig, R. (eds.), Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
2. Altig, R., McDiarmid, R.W. (1999): Body plan: development and morphology. pp: 24-52. In: McDiarmid, R.W., Altig, R. (eds.), Tadpoles. The biology of anuran larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
3. Altig R., Whiles, M.R., Taylor, C.L. (2007): What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats. Freshwater Biology 52 386-395.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01694.x
4. Álvarez. D., Nicieza, A.G. (2002): Effects of temperature and food quality on anuran larval growth and metamorphosis. Functional Ecology 16: 640-648.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00658.x
5. Ambrogio, A., Mezzadri, S. (2014): Girini d'Italia Tadpoles of Italy. Gavia Edizioni, Piacenza, Italy.
6. Antoniazzi, C.E., López, J.A., Lorenzón, R.E., Saigo, M., Devercelli, M., Maneyro Landó, R.E., Marchese, M.R. (2020): Trophic ecology of tadpoles in floodplain wetlands: combining gut contents, selectivity, and stable isotopes to study feeding segregation of syntopic species. Hydrobiologia 847: 3013-3024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04303-0
7. Arias, M.M., Peltzer, P.M., Lajmanovich, R.C. (2002): Diet of the giant tadpole Pseudis paradoxa platensis (Anura, Pseudidae) from Argentina. Phyllomedusa 1:97-100.
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v1i2p97-100
8. Arnold, E.N. (2002): Reptiles and Amphibians of Europe. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
9. Auer, W. (2021): Poa alpina. In: PalDat A palynological database.
https://www.paldat.org/pub/Poa_alpina/304799 accessed 2025.01.27
10. Babini, S., Martina, L.C., Luque, E., Gari, N., Salas, N., Martino, A.L. (2017): Anuran larvae diet from agroecosystem's ponds environmental quality and implications for their populations. Journal of Limnology 76: 137-147.
https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1455
11. Baffico, G.D., Úbeda, C.A. (2006): Larval diet of the frog Alsodes gargola (Leptodactylidae: Telmatobiinae) and some ecological considerations on its role in alpine and mountain aquatic environments in Patagonia. Amphibia-Reptilia 27: 161-168.
https://doi.org/10.1163/156853806777239986
12. Bionda, C.L., Luque, E., Gari, N., Salas, N.E., Lajmanovich, R.C., Martino, A.L. (2013): Diet of tadpoles of Physalaemus biligonigerus (Leiuperidae) from agricultural ponds in the central region of Argentina. Acta Herpetologica 8: 141-146.
https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-11433
13. Bishop, P.J., Angulo, A., Lewis, J.P., Moore, R.D., Rabb, G.B., Garcia Moreno, J. (2012): The Amphibian Extinction Crisis - what will it take to put the action into the Amphibian Conservation Action Plan? S.A.P.I.EN.S 5(2): 97-111.
14. Blaustein, A.R., Wake, D.B. (1990): Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5: 203-204.
15. Carey, C., Cohen, N., Rollins-Smith, L. (1999): Amphibian declines: an immunological perspective. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 23:459-472
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-305x(99)00028-2
16. Carey, C., Heyer, W.R., Wilkinson, J., Alford, R.A., Arntzen, J.W., Halliday, T., Hungerford, L., Lips, K.R., Middleton, E.M., Orchard, S.A., Rand, A.S. (2001): Amphibian declines and environmental change: use of remote-sensing data to identify environmental correlates. Conservation Biology 15: 903-913.
17. Carey, C., Alexander, M.A. (2003): Climate change and amphibian declines: Is there a link? Diversity and Distributions 9 111-121.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00011.x
18. Castro, C.S., Argentim, D., Oliveira, L.C., Zacarkim, C.E., Agostinho, C.A. (2017): Feeding rates for bullfrogs with automated feed management and high feeding frequency. Archivos de Zootecnia 66(253): 126-130.
19. Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., Jablonski, D., Lymberakis, P. (2024): Rana graeca. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: T58605A229005415.
https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/58605/229005415 accessed 2025.01.23
20. Ćirković, G., Ajtić, R. (2022): Preliminary investigation of tadpoles diet of species Rana temporaria, Rana dalmatina, Bufo bufo and Bufotes viridis from different localities in Serbia and determination of presence of microplastics. 14th Symposium on the Flora of Southeastern Serbia and Neighboring Regions, Kladovo, Serbia. Abstract book, pp. 208.
21. Ćirković, G., Ajtić, R. (2023): Preliminary results of geometric and traditional morphometric analysis of Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria tadpoles exposed to polyethylene microplastics. 22nd European Congress of Herpetology, Wolverhampton, UK. Abstract book, pp. 62.
22. Ćirković, G., Rakonjac, A., Ajtić, R. (2023): Results of the first analysis of tadpoles' diet and determination of microplastics presence of Rana, Bufo and Bufotes species from different localities in Serbia. Biologica Nyssana 14(1): 31-38.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8027114
23. Ćirković, G., Rakonjac, A., Ajtić, R. (2024): Nutrition of Bufo bufo tadpoles from Zlatar Mountain (Republic of Serbia). 9th Aquatic Biodiversity International Conference, Sibiu, Romania. Abstract book, pp. 30.
24. Da Costa Araújo, A.P., de Melo, N.F.S., de Oliveira Junior, A.G., Rodrigues, F.P., Fernandes, T., de Andrade Vieira, J.E., Rocha, T.L., Malafaia, G. (2019): How much are microplastics harmful to the health of amphibians? A study with pristine polyethylene microplastics and Physalaemus cuvieri. Journal of Hazardous Materials 382 121066
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121066
25. Dgebuadze, Y.Y., Sushchik, N.N., Bashinskiy, I.V., Makhutova, O.N., Kalacheva, G.S., Osipov, V.V., Gladyshev, M.I. (2017): Analysis of fatty acid composition revealed differences in the diets of tadpoles of two amphibian species. Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 472 31-34.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1607672917010082
26. Dickman, M. (1968): The effect of grazing by tadpoles on the structure of a perifiton community. Ecology 49(6): 1188-1190.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1934511
27. Duellman, E.W., Trueb, L. (1986): Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York.
28. Dutra, S.L., Callisto, M. (2005): Macroinvertebrates as tadpole food: Importance and body-size relationships. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22: 923-927.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000400018
29. Gonçalves, M.I., Kloh, S.J., Ruthsatz, K., Figueredo, C.C., Eterovick, C.P. (2023): Description and shaping factors of diet and feeding ecology of neotropical tadpoles: A case study and a comprehensive review. Austral Ecology 49: e13302.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.13302
30. Gosner, K.L. (1960): A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183-190.
31. Harrison, J.D. (1987): Food and feeding relations of common frog and common toad tadpoles (Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo) at a pond in Mid-Wales. Herpetological Journal 1: 141-143.
32. Halbritter, H., Heigl, H., Auer, W. (2021): Pinus sylvestris. In: PalDat A palynological database.
https://www.paldat.org/pub/Pinus_sylvestris/306147 accessed 2025.01.27
33. Hershey, A.E., Fortino, K., Peterson, B.J., Ulseth, A.J. (2007): Stream food webs. pp. 637-661. In: Hauer, F.R., Lamberti, G.A. (eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology. 2nd Edition. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.
34. Hu, L., Chernick, M., Hinton, D.E., Shi, H. (2018): Microplastics in small waterbodies and tadpoles from Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental Science & Technology 52: 8885-8893.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8602279
35. Huang, C., Liang, M., Kam, Y. (2003): The fatty acid composition of oophagous tadpoles (Chirixalus eiffingeri) fed conspecific or chicken egg yolk. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 135: 329-336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00082-5
36. Huckembeck, S., Loebmann, D., Albertoni, E.F., Hefler, S.M., Oliveira, M.C., Garcia, A.M. (2014): Feeding ecology and basal food sources that sustain the Paradoxal frog Pseudis minuta a multiple approach combining stomach content, prey availability, and stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 740: 253-264.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2022-2
37. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. (2023): Rana dalmatina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023: eT58584A89705029.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2023-1.RL.TS.T58584A89705029.en accessed 2025.01.23.
38. Iwai, N., Kagaya, T. (2005): Growth of Japanese toad (Bufo japonicus formosus) tadpoles fed different food items. Current Herpetology 24: 85-89.
https://doi.org/10.3105/1345-5834(2005)24[85:GOJTBJ]2.0.CO;2
39. John, D.M., Whitton, B.A., Brook, A.J. (2011): Freshwater algal flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9781108784122
40. Jüttner, I., Williams, D.M., Levkov, Z., Falasco, E., Battegazzore, M., Cantonati, M., Van de Vijver, B., Angele, C., Ector, L. (2015): Reinvestigation of the type material for Odontidium hyemale (Roth) Kützing and related species, with description of four new species in the genus Odontidium (Fragilariaceae, Bacillariophyta). Phytotaxa 234(1): 1-36.
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.234.1.1
41. Karaoğlu, K., Gül, S. (2020): Characterization of microplastic pollution in tadpoles living in small water-bodies from Rize, the northeast of Turkey, Chemosphere 255: 126915.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126915
42. Kloh, J.S., Figueredo, C.C., Eterovick, P.C. (2018): You are what, where, and when you eat: seasonal and ontogenetic changes in a tropical tadpole's diet. Amphibia-Reptilia 39: 445-456.
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-17000209
43. Kloh, J.S., Figueredo, C.C, Eterovick, P.C. (2019): How close is microhabitat and diet association in aquatic ecomorphotypes? A test with tadpoles of syntopic species. Hydrobiologia 828: 271-285.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3818-2
44. Kloh, J.S., Figueredo, C.C., Calaca, P., Eterovick, C.P. (2024): Pollen as food: effects of consumption on tadpole growth, development, and mobility. Hydrobiologia 851(9): 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05439-5
45. Kolenda, K., Kuśmierek, N., Pstrowska, K. (2020): Microplastic ingestion by tadpoles of pond-breeding amphibians - first results from Central Europe (SW Poland). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27: 33380-33384.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09648-6
46. Krammer, K., Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986): Bacillariophyceae 1, Teil: Naviculaceae. pp. 1-876. In: Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heying, H., Mollenhauer, D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.
47. Krammer, K., Lange-Bertalot, H. (1988): Bacillariophyceae 2, Teil: Bacilariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surelliaceae. pp. 1-596. In: Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heying, H., Mollenhauer, D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart and Jena.
48. Krammer, K., Lange-Bertalot, H. (1991): Bacillariophyceae 4, Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. pp. 1-437. In: Ettl, H., Gartner, G., Gerloff, J., Heying, H., Mollenhauer, D. (eds.), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart and New York.
49. Kupferberg, S. (1997): The role of larval diet in anuran metamorphosis. American Zoologist 37: 146-159.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ich/37.2.146
50. Loman, J. (2001): Effects of tadpoles grazing on periphytic algae in ponds. Wetlands Ecology and Management 9: 135-139.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011106417883
51. López-de Sancha, A., Boix, D., Benejam, L., Briggs, L., Davidson, T.A., Fahy, J.C., Frutos-Aragón, V., Greaves, H.M., Lemmens, P., Mehner, T., Martin, L., Oertli, B., Saver, C., Brucet, S. (2025): Amphibian conservation in Europe: the importance of pond condition. Biodiversity and Conservation 34: 1559-1574.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03033-w
52. Lowe, R.L., LaLiberte, G.D. (2007): Benthic stream algae distribution and structure. pp. 327-356. In: Hauer, F.R., Lamberti, G.A. (eds.), Methods in Stream Ecology. 2nd Edition. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.
53. McDiarmid, R.W., Altig, R. (2009): Morphology of amphibian larvae. pp. 39-53. In: Dodd, J.C.K. (ed.), Amphibian Ecology and Conservation - A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199541188.003.0003
54. Parlato, P.B., Mott, L.C. (2023): Consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of omnivorous tadpoles on aquatic invertebrate communities. Ecosphere 14: e4474.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4474
55. Pastorino, P., Prearo, M., Di Blasio, A., Barcelo, D., Anselmi, S., Colussi, S., Alberti, S., Tedde, G., Dondo, A., Ottino, M., Pizzul, E., Renzi, M. (2022): Microplastics occurrence in the European Common Frog (Rana temporaria) from Cottian Alps (Northwest Italy). Diversity 14: 66.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020066
56. Petrovan, S.O., Schmidt, B.R. (2016): Volunteer conservation action data reveals large-scale and long-term negative population trends of a widespread amphibian, the common toad (Bufo bufo). PLoS One 11: 20161943.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161943
57. Pollo, F.E., Cibils-Martina, L., Otero, M.A., Baraquet, M., Grenat, P.R., Salas, N.E., Martino, A.L. (2019): Anuran tadpoles inhabiting a fluoride-rich stream: diets and morphological indicators. Heliyon 5(6): e02003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.02003
58. Protázio, A.S., Protázio, A.S., Gama, V., Vieira Silva, S., Cruz dos Santos, K.G., Gomes de Oliveira, J.K. (2020): Diet of tadpoles of five anuran species from northeast Brazil. Journal of Limnology 79(2): 180-186.
https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2020.1912
59. Pryor, S.G. (2014): Tadpole nutritional ecology and digestive physiology: implications for captive rearing of larval anurans. Zoo Biology 33(2): 502-507.
https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21152
60. Pujol-Buxó, E., Montori, A., Campeny, R., Llorente, G. (2017): Observations on the intraspecific variation in tadpole morphology in natural ponds. Acta Herpetologica 12: 193-197.
https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-20894
61. Ranvestel, A.W., Lips, K.R., Pringle, C.M., Whiles, R.M., Bixby, R.J. (2004): Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshwater Biology 49: 274-285.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01184.x
62. Rozkošný, R. (1980): Klíč vodních larv hmyzu. Vydala Academia, nakladatelství Československé akademie věd, Praha.
63. Sabagh, L.T., Ferreira, G.L., Branco, C.W.C., Rocha, C.F.D., da Rocha, D.P.P., Dias, N.Y.N. (2012): Larval diet in bromeliad pools: A case study of tadpoles of two species in the genus Scinax (Hylidae). Copeia 2012 683-689.
https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-12-012
64. Santos, F.J.M., Protázio, A.S., Moura, C.W.N., Juncă, F.A. (2016): Diet and food resource partition among benthic tadpoles of three anuran species in Atlantic Forest tropical streams. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 31: 53-60.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2015.1015109
65. Schiesari, L., Werner, E.E., Kling, G.W. (2009): Carnivory and resource-based niche differentiation in anuran larvae: implications for food web and experimental ecology. Freshwater Biology 54: 572-586.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02134.x
66. Seale, D.B. (1980): Influence of amphibian larvae on primary production, nutrient flux, and competition in a pond ecosystem. Ecology 61: 1531-1550.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1939059
67. Seale, D.B., Beckvar, N. (1980): The comparative ability of anuran larvae (Genera Hyla, Bufo, and Rana) to ingest suspended blue-green algae. Copeia 1980: 495-503.
68. Skelly, K.D., Golon, J. (2003): Assimilation of natural benthic substrates by two species of tadpoles. Herpetologica 59(1): 37-42.
69. Souza-Ferreira, M.L.C., Dos Reis, A.J.O., Ferreira, E.B.L., Dipold, J., Freitas, A.Z., Wetter, N.U., de Oliveira-Bahia, V.R.L., Vieira, T.B. (2025): First record of microplastic contamination in adult endemic amazonian anuran species. Scientific Reports 15(1): 2403.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86434-9
70. Spellerberg, I.F. (2002): Amphibians and Reptiles of North-west Europe. Their natural history, ecology and conservation. Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, NH, USA.
71. Spybroeck, J., Beukema, W., Bok, B., Van Der Voort, J. (2016): Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Britain and Europe. Bloomsbury Wildlife, London, UK.
72. Steinwascher, K., Travis, J. (1983): Influence of food quality and quantity on early larval growth of two anurans. Copeia 1983: 238-242.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1444720
73. Tiberti, R., Canedoli, C., Rolla, M. (2015): The diet of Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 in relation to prey availability near its altitudinal limit. Hyla 2: 20-28.
74. Trakimas, G., Jardine, D.T., Barisevičiūtė, R., Garbaras, A., Skipitytė, R., Remeikis, V. (2011): Ontogenetic dietary shifts in European common frog (Rana temporaria) revealed by stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 675: 87-95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0804-3
75. Valakos, E.D., Pafilis, P., Sotiropoulos, K., Lymberakis, P., Maragou, P., Foufopoulos, J. (2008): The Amphibians and Reptiles of Greece. Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
76. Vassilieva, A.B., Sinev, A.Y., Tiunov, A.V. (2017): Trophic segregation of anuran larvae in two temporary tropical ponds in southern Vietnam. Herpetological Journal 27: 217-229.
77. Vences, M., Hauswaldt, S., Steinfartz, S., Rupp, O., Goesmann, A., Kunzel, S., Orozco-ter Wengel, P., Vieites, D.R., Nieto-Roman, S., Haas, S., Laugsch, C., Gehara, M., Bruchmann, S., Pabijan, M., Ludewig, A.-K., Rudert, D., Angelini, C., Borkin, L.J., Crochet, P.A., Crottini, A., Smirnov, N.A. (2013): Radically different phylogeographies and patterns of genetic variation in two European brown frogs, genus Rana. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68: 657-670.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.04.014
78. Vera Candioti, M.F. (2005): Morphology and feeding in tadpoles of Ceratophrys cranwelli (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Acta Zoologica 86: 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-7272.2005.00178.x
79. Vera Candioti, M.F. (2007): Anatomy of anuran tadpoles from lentic water bodies: Systematic relevance and correlation with feeding habits. Zootaxa 1600: 1-175.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1600.1.1
80. Vukov, T., Kalezić, M.L., Tomović, Lj., Krizmanić, L., Jović, D., Labus, N., Džukić, G. (2013): Amphibians in Serbia - Distribution and diversity patterns. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum 6: 90-112.
https://doi.org/10.5937/bnhmb1306090V
81. Wehr, J.D., Sheath, R.G., Kociolek, J.P. (2015): Freshwater algae of North America, ecology and classification. Academic Press, San Diego.
82. Wells, K.D. (2007): The ecology and behavior of Amphibians. The University of Chicago Press.
83. Whiles, M.R., Altig, R. (2009): Dietary assessments of larval amphibians. pp. 71-86. In. Dodd Jr., C.K. (ed.), Amphibian Ecology and Conservation - A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199541188.003.0005
84. Whiles, M.R., Gladzshev, M.I., Sushchik, N.N., Makhutova, O.N., Kalachova, G.S., Peterson, S.D., Regester, K.J. (2010): Fatty acid analyses reveal high degrees of omnivory and dietary plasticity in pond-dwelling tadpoles. Freshwater Biology 55: 1533-1547.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02364.x
85. Whiles, M.R., Lips, K.R., Pringle, C.M., Kilham, S.S., Bixby, R.J., Brenes, R., Connelly, S., Colon-Gaud, J.C., Hunte-Brown, M., Huryn, A.D., Montgomery, C., Peterson, S. (2006): The effects of amphibian population declines on the structure and function of Neotropical stream ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4(1): 27-34.
https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)00410027:teoapd]2.0.co;2